And true to form, the key feature of this initiative was the expulsion of almost all of the “expatriate” white farmers who made Zimbabwe’s annual harvest the envy of the entire Commonwealth. But just as it was decades ago – when other black leaders tried such similar policies and found them wanton – Mugabe’s pogrom has proved disastrous.But the most salient difference in this case is that – with Zimbabwe about to celebrate its 27th year of independence under his leadership – even the congenitally anti-British Mugabe cannot blame the legacy of colonialism for his country’s demise.
Alas, another more tragic difference is that – unlike his fellow black leaders who implemented aggressive measures to redress the failures of their pogroms – Mugabe seems determined to continue his “sweeping land reforms” come what may. This, even though evidence of the inhumane legacy his jingoistic and myopic reforms have wrought is clear for all to see.
In fact, here is the dire warning his national security minister, Didymus Mutasa, issued on Monday to the few remaining white farmers whose farms had not yet been seized (and they too expelled):
Those farmers who do not comply with the orders to vacate the land will be dealt with severely….It’s the duty of police to see to it that those who don’t abide by the laws are incarcerated.
Meanwhile, here is part of the lamentation I expressed for Zimbabwe in March 2005:
Five years ago, there were 4000 white-owned farms in Zimbabwe; today, there are only 400 (mostly unproductive) farms left. Five years ago, Zimbabwe was the breadbasket of sub-Saharan Africa; today, it is a basket case of starving people.
But then, in November 2005, long-suffering Zimbabweans seemed to have won a reprieve when the BBC reported that Mugabe had finally agreed to ease his iron-fisted rule after realizing that doling out white farms as patronage to black cronies – who had no experience (or interest) in farming – did not guarantee his political legacy…or survival. Never mind the criminally negligent death by starvation of hundreds of thousands of his people that resulted from his seizure of white farms; or the rendering homeless of millions more after he bulldozed their homes pursuant to the “Operation-wipe-out-the-trash” phase of his land reforms.
However, notwithstanding that BBC report (which also cited the prospect of Mugabe soliciting many of the 3,600 white farmers he evicted to return to their farms), I expressed doubts about his conversion – in “Mugabe Finally Admits That Starving His Own People Was a Mistake. No Shit,” November 7, 2005 – as follows:
…my serially vindicated cynicism compels me to suspect that this mea culpa is just another amoral ploy by Mugabe to elicit sympathy and extract financial aid from Western donors. After all, feigning regret for the suffering they’ve inflicted on their own people has always served Africa’s ‘big Dadas’ (despotic rulers) well when courting rich countries (like the United States during the Cold War and China today).
Therefore, I was not at all surprised when the Washington Post reported this week that – despite completely destroying Zimbabwe’s economy and presiding over a government that is indisputably the most venal, inhumane, corrupt, dysfunctional and incompetent in Africa – Mugabe remains committed to keeping his country mired in the death throes of genocidal starvation.
What I find utterly incomprehensible, however, is that – given all the international protests being mounted to stop the genocide being perpetrated by Arabs against blacks in Darfur, Sudan – relatively little protest is being mounted to stop the genocide being perpetrated by Mugabe against his own people. And, in this respect, I am constrained to indict his fellow African heads of state especially for being complicit in his crimes against humanity by their silence….
Yes, save Darfur! But what about Zimbabwe – where for years children have been competing with dogs in scavenging the streets for food….
NOTE: You can help. Please register your outrage by contacting your political representatives and community leaders and asking what, if anything, your government is doing to help save Zimbabwe.
Related Articles:
Zimbabweans pray for liberation…
political cleansing in Zimbabwe…
Mugabe’s mea culpa…
Save Darfur…
Robert Mugabe, starvation genocide
ALH ipinions says
Adam: The following is a reprint of your earlier comment. We updated this post earlier and the original post of your comment was lost. ALH ipinions
Adam has left a new comment on your post “Save Zimbabwe…”:
Mr. Hall, I appreciate your view on Zimbabwe, but would like to make a few points: the white farmers in Zimbabwe are not expatriates. the majority of them are Zimbabwean citizens with no dual citizenship of any other nation. You may liken them to the children of Jamaican immigrants to the UK. The policies of ZANU-PF are not mismanagement. They are similar to the tactics of the Khmer-Rouge in Cambodia, a regime held in high esteem by Mugabe himself. They are designed to entrench the party, regardless of the cost to the country. they are working. How soon we forget that it was the same government that in the 90’s had one of the world’s fastest growing economies, as well the highest returning stock exchange. They did not simply become incompetent over night. what happened is that the Zimbabwean people simply wanted change. The government would not let them. they thus have embarked on a systematic destruction of the economy to make basic survival so difficult there is no time for uprising. Thus we see the pathetic opposition that exists in Zimbabwe today. The country is rich in natural resources, earning over US$2bn last year; more than enough to dole out in patronage. The productive agricultural enterprises are still very operational, serving the likes of Sainsbury’s in the UK until today. This is not dysfunction. Many assume incorrectly that the passing of Mugabe will change things. it will not. Mugabe is not the party. There are thousands of die-hard party supporters who truly belief they are entitled to plunder the country for whatever role, real or imagined, that they played in the liberation of Zimbabwe. They will be around for some time to come. By linking his policy to the issue of property rights from colonialism, Mugabe has ensured that no Third World country will denounce his actions. To date not a single one has done so. That is not incompetence. Sad that a man once venerated for his role in the struggle against oppression will go done in history as the man who presided over the fastest shrinking economy in the world, but for them, faced with losing power and possible trials in The Hague, their current path has no options. “…better to rule over a pile of rubble, than not to rule at all”.
ALH ipinions says
ALH ipinions has left a new comment on your post “Save Zimbabwe…”:
Fair point on the “expatriate” designation Adam.
I’m aware that the whites in Zimbabwe are as “born to the soil” of that country as white Boers are born to the soil of South Africa.
Nonetheless, (and I suspect you are aware of this) not only Mugabe but even Zimbabweans who oppose his rule and misguided land reforms refer to native whites as expatriates.
Clearly, they take a rather longer view of history….
The Radical Mindset! says
Thank you for your zeal for Zim!
I invite you to my http://www.zimfinalpush.blogspot.com
Rev Mufaro Stig Hove.