The attacker, [a Muslim who police once had on their radar], stabbed the unarmed officer before being shot dead.
Forty other people were injured after a car struck pedestrians on nearby Westminster Bridge, before it crashed. …
Speaking in Downing Street after chairing a meeting of the government’s Cobra emergencies committee, Prime Minister Theresa May said it was a ‘sick and depraved’ attack on the heart of the capital and attempts to defeat UK values were ‘doomed to failure.’
(BBC, March 22, 2017)
Latest reports are that four of the injured have died, including the police officer. My thoughts and prayers go out to all those directly affected.
That said, I appreciate the terror people feel whenever news breaks about Muslims perpetrating another terrorist attack. But, truth be told, this should be no greater than the terror they feel whenever news breaks about non-Muslims perpetrating another mass shooting.
This is why it’s so stupefying that the police, media, and politicians invariably treat the former like an existential tragedy, but the latter like an ordinary crime – notwithstanding that mass shootings are more frequent and invariably result in more casualties.
In any event, here is the NOTE I appended to “Carnage in Nice: France Attacked … Again,” July 15, 2016:
There is now a Groundhog-Day spectre to these attacks and reaction to them. Which is why they have become no more worthy of comment than another drive-by shooting in ‘Chiraq.’ Therefore, I shall suffice henceforth to reprise this commentary, taking care of course to acknowledge the targets and victims of future attacks.
Nothing affirms this Groundhog-Day spectre quite like the commentary I wrote a few years ago, which I felt could only be titled “Islamists Terrorizing London … Again,” May 25, 2013. But it speaks even greater volumes that what I wrote about last year’s attack in France is relevant, in every respect, to yesterday’s attack in London.
Accordingly:
**********
The vicious Bastille Day attack in the French city of Nice that killed at least 84 people was an act of terrorism, France’s President Francois Hollande said early Friday.
The driver, identified as a 31-year-old French Tunisian, crashed his truck into a crowd of people who were watching fireworks. He plowed the vehicle-turned-weapon forward for more than a mile before police shot him dead, Agence-France Press reported. The truck was loaded with “arms and grenades” Region President Christian Estrosi said, but some of them were fake.
(Huffington World Post, July 15, 2016)
With all due respect to the victims of this latest terrorist attack, the operative word in my title is “Again.”
After all, whether here in the United States or over in Europe, Asia, Africa, or the Middle East, terrorist attacks have become a fact of life … the new normal.
In any event, I presaged these attacks in “World Beware: French Riots Affect Us All,” November 8, 2005. In it, I highlighted the disaffection, disillusionment, and discrimination (racial and religious) that make young Muslim men so susceptible to radicalization. Never mind the chickens-coming-home-to-roost factor stemming from the invasion of Iraq, which spawned the “one thousand Bin Ladens” former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak warned about.
For a little perspective, it might be helpful to think of the so-called War on Terror like the War on Drugs, and to appreciate that we can be no more successful waging the former than we’ve been waging the latter. Nothing demonstrates this quite like the way terrorism has forced us to change our way of life – with our liberal democracies becoming more like barricaded police states every day. We all know about the Chicken-Little security measures at airports, but have you noticed that municipalities are reinforcing streets with 20 unsightly bollards for every 1 street lamp.
Yet, if it seems like we are helpless in the face of such terrorist attacks, it’s because we are. I’ve been bemoaning this for over a decade:
It must be understood that, no matter their collective resolve, there’s absolutely nothing our governments can do to prevent such attacks. That Americans reacted yesterday as if those explosions went off in Washington or New York should compel Westerners to focus on calming our collective nerves, instead of fretting about (or worse, trying to figure out) the motivation for and timing of terrorist attacks by Islamic fanatics.
(“7/7 Terror Attacks in London,” The iPINIONS Journal, July 8, 2005)
Many criticized President Obama for years for ordering American troops to do too little to “defeat the terrorists.” By contrast, they hailed President Putin last September for ordering Russian troops to “bomb the hell out of them.”
Except that 100-plus attacks in Western cities just this year (mostly by radicalized lone-wolf terrorists) make patently clear that this bombing is doing nothing to defeat them. In fact, all Putin has to show for nine months of bombing, from the air and sea, is such indiscriminate death and wanton destruction, terrorist leaders can fairly assert that he is responsible for killing more innocent men, women, and children than they.
Sadly, it did not take long for me to decry that “Bombing ISIS Smacks of Masturbatory Violence,” November 18, 2015.
Mind you, I’m not saying we should just lie back and take their attacks. To the contrary, I’m on record advocating targeted drone strikes, aggressive surveillance, and enhanced interrogation to keep terrorists at bay as much as humanly possible.
Notwithstanding the misguided backlash Snowden’s NSA disclosures have wrought, [Western countries] must allow their respective intelligence services to use all means necessary to surveil and apprehend the would-be terrorists among us before they act out their jihadist fantasies. Otherwise, we will terrorize ourselves to death if we keep reacting to every [terrorist attack] as if it were another 9/11.
(“Gunman Terrorizes Canada. Keep Calm and Carry On,” The iPINIONS Journal, October 23, 2014)
But don’t get me started on xenophobic and racist policies like banning or profiling Muslims. After all, the record of terrorist attacks in this country is such that we clearly have far more to fear from born-and-bred American terrorists than from any Muslim braving the two-year vetting process to sneak in and launch attacks.
On the other hand, the media could help if they stop providing wall-to-wall coverage of the fallout from such attacks. After all, such coverage to a terrorist is like a binge to an addict. And, notwithstanding all of the experts rehashing their anti-terror talking points, it does absolutely nothing to help prevent, or protect us from, future attacks.
I don’t know why the media always reward these psychopaths by giving them the fame they covet; that is, by plastering their pathetic mugs all over television and reporting pop psychology about why and how they did their dastardly deeds.
You’d think … we would have figured out by now that the best way to discourage them is by focusing our attention on the victims and limiting what we say about the [terrorists] to: May God have mercy on your soul as you all burn in Hell!
(“Massacre in Omaha,” The iPINIONS Journal, December 7, 2007)
Of course, media barons know this all too well. It’s just that they would rather exploit macabre, rubbernecking interests for ratings (their repetitious mind-dumbing, emotion-numbing content notwithstanding) than deny terrorists their incentivizing fix.
Therefore, the only thing we can do to help save ourselves is turn off the TV and pay respects to victims with a prayer, making sure to note that:
There but for the grace of God (go I).
But nothing would affirm and embolden national spirits quite like those of us not directly affected getting on with life in the face these attacks. This includes the police processing the scene and municipal workers cleaning it up post-haste.
Incidentally, it would also help if politicians would stop using every terrorist attack to burnish their leadership bona fides; you know, the way Mayor Rudy Giuliani used 9/11.
All else, including posting sympathy hashtags on social media and projecting national flags on landmarks, is folly.
**********
Apropos of folly, I doubt Londoners got any consolation from President Trump’s banal and chauvinistic tweet assuring them that Prime Minister May is “strong and doing very well.”
Again, keep calm and carry on.
Related commentaries:
Islamists terrorizing…
Carnage in Nice…
World beware…
Brussels Paris San Bernadino et al…
Masturbatory violence…
Chiraq…